In this post, I am attempting to make some sense of my argument for a paper I am planning to write.  For this paper I am doing a critical analysis of World of Warcraft’s FigurePrints service.

In making my thoughts and assumptions explicit, I have very strong opinions about how World of Warcraft favors certain playstyles over others.  I feel that the design and “loudest” player groups have created a game culture that favors ambition, aggressiveness, and a focus on certain achievements over others.  (Warning: The following sentence might be highly subjective or half-baked).  High level or “epic/elite” activities, raiding, or player vs. player are seen as “better” than any-level activities like exploration, pet collection, or crafting.  While these any-level activities are not seen as unimportant, they don’t have near the prestige of the other activities, and are often treated as a means to an end. Continue reading »

I recently participated in one of those joint school-company training sessions.  I will just call the company “Acme”, and state that they provide a large assortment of design tools that we all know and love.  I was quite disappointed with it.  I can deal with being shamelessly advertised to, but this event was particularly bad because “Acme” was trying to force me to use their tools in a certain way and telling me how I should think about my own design process.  Scary stuff. Continue reading »

So I went into Penn Station yesterday with a buddy (Matt) to have some lunch.  When we sat down, I noticed the numerous metal bins of potatoes stacked up next to the fryers.  If you have ever been to a Penn Station, you know that the fries are fresh cut.  Anyway, I thought it was interesting that while my friend Matt was talking to me, my mind shut him out for about 15 seconds while I stared at those potatoes.  Here is what happened inside my head during those 15 seconds: Continue reading »

This is sort of a continuation of the previous post about designing to change behavior. I am not really arguing one side or the other here, rather I am searching for some insights about design. To that end I have chosen a few books to dive into this summer, among them the book Freakonomics. One of the main themes of the book is about how we are creatures of incentive. Most people think only of business and marketing when they hear the word incentive, but Freakonomics speaks more about psychological and social motivations. Continue reading »

I have read a lot of articles that specifically say a designer’s job is to change behavior. Perhaps I am but a naive designer, but I don’t know if I buy into that statement. I have been thinking a lot about it, and I had a fellow student ask me why I thought this. Here is my response to him: Continue reading »

After attending CHI 2009 I gained some perspective. It seems that the industry that I am about to dive into, full of youthful exuberance and naivety, has grossly understated the value and potential of HCI. The field of HCI seems to still be very focused on user-centered design, and sometimes uses the phrase human-centered design interchangeably. I don’t feel that human-centered design is user-centered design. This is not a new topic, as it has already seen some play in Interactions Magazine among other places. In what follows I will explain what I feel the difference is and why it is important to note it. Continue reading »

Brainstorming is an integral part of the design process, but sometimes it can be difficult to come up with decent or diverse design concepts. During my first semester of study in the Human-Computer Interaction Design Master’s program at Indiana University, I learned several brainstorming tips to add to my bag of tricks. Wolf these down and see how they treat you: Continue reading »

Being a few months removed from my first design projects in my HCI/d Master’s study at Indiana University, I have some reflections and lessons learned.  For this particular project I worked with another student to design a green thermostat.  The project took about a week and included some informal user research, concept sketches, prototyping in Visual Basic, user testing, and redesign.  Here are my reflections in all the glory that a bullet list can provide:

  • Clear sketches lead to clearer communication.  Both my knowledge of what sketching can do for me as a language of thought, and my abilities to sketch what I am thinking still need some serious work.  This is something that I have been putting further effort into practicing.
  • Personas are a great tool when you can’t do in-depth interviews, ethnography, and contextual research.  They obviously can’t truly stand in for a real person, but they can still be helpful.  Also, any of the designer’s tools (in this case personas), can be put to use in slightly different ways depending on the designer, the company, and the context.
  • It isn’t necessary to add more features to accomplish design goals.  We incorporated many features in an attempt to change behavior instead of adapting the design to fit with existing behavior.  For instance we might have let the user turn the thermostat way up or down, but have the thermostat keep the temperature within acceptable ranges.
  • High-fidelity prototypes can make it more difficult to get proper feedback.  We did ourselves, our design, and our users a disservice by going straight from concept to high-fidelity prototype.  If we had used a low-fidelity prototype we could have helped our test participants to focus on the concept of the design instead of the little details, and ensured that they were less inclined to hold back criticism.
© 2012 People First Design Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha